WARDOGS Weapon Tier List

33 weapons ranked, built from 6 attributed published tier lists rather than one opinion. Hover any weapon to see what each source called it.

Early Access to Update 0.2.06 sourcesbuilt 2026-10-17how this is built

S tier

Top of the consensus across every source we read.

A
7
B
8
C
8
D
4
F
3

Not ranked: TCX-SPR (1), PP-19 Bizon (1), Evo-3 Ultra (1), M12G (0), M14 (1), 9K333 Verba (2). Fewer than 3 of the 6 sources placed them, and one voice is not a consensus. Their pages show who did.

Source cutoff: 2 sources dropped on 2026-09-24, 14 days after Early Access, for still reading a pre-launch build: MetaForge, Playhub.

Community-recorded from the in-game vendor, cross-checked across independent databases. Where they disagree on a price, the figure Bulkhead printed in its patch notes settles it when one database already matches it. Every other number is the databases' reading, and Early Access can retune any of them.

How this is built

6 sources, one letter, and what we did and did not do

6 sources, combined rather than picked between. We measure none of this ourselves. Each published its own ranking under its own name, and this page is an average of those, not a claim of our own. Each card says which build that source read and what kind of source it is.

The sources do not share a scale, so each list is combined in a way that stops any one scale from dominating the result. A source that did not place a weapon counts as no opinion rather than a bad one, and bands that are not ranks (an unranked or specialist group) are never scored.

The combination and the S to F split are ours. The rankings are not, and none of the underlying opinions were measured by us. Statistical data is based on external APIs and publicly available information. It may differ from official data.

FAQ

Where does this ranking come from?

It combines 6 published WARDOGS weapon tier lists, each attributed to the site, the named writer or the YouTube creator who published it, for Early Access to Update 0.2.0. We measure none of it ourselves: the game has no telemetry source and Bulkhead publishes no performance data, so instead of inventing numbers we aggregate rankings that carry a name, and credit each one. Hovering a weapon shows what each source called it. Statistical data is based on external APIs and publicly available information. It may differ from official data.

Why are the tier letters yours and not theirs?

Because the sources do not share a scale. Their lists run from 4 to 5 bands. Some leave weapons unplaced, and a YouTube creator ranks in their own labels rather than letters. Comparing their labels directly would reward whoever is most generous with the top band, so each list is combined in a way that stops any one scale from dominating, and the S to F letters here are our own split of the result.

Why is a weapon placed by only some sources, or not ranked at all?

A source that did not place a weapon is treated as having no opinion on it, never as ranking it last. Wardogs HQ, for example, places 10 of the 33 weapons ranked here; the others are averaged over the sources that did place them. A weapon does need placements from at least 3 of the 6 sources to get a tier: with fewer, one generous placement would be a perfect score, and one voice outranking near-unanimity is the average failing. Weapons under that floor are named above with their count.

One of the sources sells in-game cash or services. Does that matter?

It is why it is labelled. Overgear (Nurseos) publishes a bylined guide on a site that sells WARDOGS currency or boosting, which is a commercial interest no fan database has. It is one voice of 6 and its row says who wrote it; weigh it as you would any other.